JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 16, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Director General De La Ungrd

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Reiteración de jurisprudencia sobre desconocimiento del precedente constitucional
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia por no existir cambio de jurisprudencia
  • Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Tanto el Director General de la Unidad Nacional para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres (UNGRD), como el Presidente del Consejo Departamental de Gestión de Riesgos de Desastres de Bolívar presentaron solicitud de nulidad contra la sentencia T-125/15.

Los interesados presentaron dos cargos, uno relacionado con la indebida integración del contradictorio al no vincular a un tercero interesado y, el otro, el desconocimiento del precedente fijado por la Corporación en las sentencias T-648/13 y T-744/14.

La Corte desestimó los cargos de nulidad invocados y decidió DENEGAR las peticiones de nulidad presentadas.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la nulidad de la sentencia T-125 de 2015 proferida por la Sala Cuarta de Revision.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.