JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 30, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Desplazamiento Forzado
  • Traslado de los informes presentados por los Organismos de Control del Estado y los acompañantes permanentes del proceso de seguimiento a la sentencia T-025/04, en atenc
Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Desplazamiento Forzado
  • Seguimiento al cumplimiento de la sentencia T-025/04
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se corre traslado de los informes presentados por los Organismos de Control del Estado y los acompañantes permanentes del proceso de seguimiento a la sentencia T-025/04, a la Unidad para las Víctimas y a la Agencia Nacional de Defensa Jurídica del Estado, con el fin de que se pronuncien si lo consideran necesario.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, el suscrito Magistrado Presidente,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. CORRER TRASLADO, a traves de la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, de los informes relacionados en el parrafo 1.3 de la parte motiva, a la Unidad para las Victimas y a la Agencia Nacional de Defensa Juridica del Estado, con el fin de que se pronuncien si lo consideran necesario.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.