JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 20, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Ruben Dario Arciniegas Calderon

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Cumplimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Abstenerse de asumir competencia para verificar cumplimiento
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional para conocer solicitud de cumplimiento
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de cumplimiento de la Sentencia SU.053/15.

El peticionario le pidió nuevamente a la Corporación adelantar el cumplimiento de la providencia de la referencia, para que le paguen los salarios, prestaciones sociales y los aportes pensionales correspondientes al período transcurrido entre la fecha del fallo y el momento en que se produjo el reintegro efectivo.

Argumentó que la Fiscalía General de la Nación se demoró 2 años y 6 meses en dar cumplimiento a la orden de reintegro.

La Corte se abstiene de tramitar la petición formulada, al considerar que el accionante intenta brindar un alcance distinto a lo ordenando en la Sentencia SU.053/15.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. ABSTENERSE de tramitar la solicitud de cumplimiento de la Sentencia SU-053 de 2015, promovida por el senor Ruben Dario Arciniegas Calderon.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR que por Secretaria General se comunique la decision adoptada en esta providencia al senor Ruben Dario Arciniegas Calderon.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.