JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 2, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Asociacion Colombiana Horizonte Asocol·Respondent Ministerio De Agricultura Y Desarrollo Rural Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Reposicion Contra Numeral Del Auto A. 363/14.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Temas a tratar: Recursos de las partes para interponer en el trámite de la acción de tutela, Aplicación de principios generales del Código de Procedimiento Civil para interpretar el procedimiento de la acción de tutela, Selección de proceso de tutela para revisión de la Corte Constitucional, Revisión de proceso de tutela no es una instancia adicional sino un trámite de interés público, Devolución de expediente para surtir trámite de revisión seguida de la nulidad del proceso.

Se rechaza recurso de reposición por improcedente

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RECHAZAR por improcedente el recurso de reposicion interpuesto en contra del numeral
  2. cuarto. del Auto A-363 de 2004, por Cristina Iragorri Valencia, en su calidad de representante legal de la Fiduciaria Davivienda, y vocera administradora del Fideicomiso Dolce Vista.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.