JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 21, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Apoderado Habitantes Conjunto Residencial Ciudad Del Sol 1

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional
  • Rechazar por extemporánea
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración del Auto 004/20.

Con la precitada providencia la Sala Cuarta de Revisión de la Corporación se pronunció sobre un incidente de desacato propuesto en contra de la Sentencia T-970/09.

El memorialista pretende que se aclare el numeral tercero de la parte resolutiva del precitado auto, porque a su juicio suscita una duda en su aplicación y por ende admite tres formas diferentes de verificar el cumplimiento.

Luego de verificar que la petición de aclaración fue presentada de manera extemporánea se dispuso su RECHAZO.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR POR EXTEMPORANEA la solicitud de aclaracion del Auto 004 de 2020, presentada por el apoderado de los habitantes del conjunto residencial "Ciudad del Sol I".
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR la presente providencia a todas las partes del proceso de tutela y al Juzgado
  3. Decimo. Penal Municipal de Barranquilla.
  4. TERCERO. Contra esta providencia no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.