JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 2, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Carlos Mario Gonzalez Gomez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion Publica De Habeas Corpus
  • Rechazar por falta de competencia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Presidencia de la Corte Constitucional decide RECHAZAR, por falta de competencia, la acción de Hábeas Corpus presentada ante la Corporación por los apoderados del señor Carlos Mario González Gómez.

Consecuentemente, ordena remitir la referida acción al Juzgado de Reparto del Circuito de Marinilla (Antioquia), a fin de que adelante el trámite de rigor que corresponda de conformidad con lo previsto en el artículo 30 de la Constitución Política, la Ley 1095 de 2006 y la Sentencia C-187/06.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por falta de competencia la accion constitucional de Habeas Corpus presentada ante la Corte Constitucional por los apoderados del senor Carlos Mario Gonzalez Gomez.
  2. SEGUNDO. REMITIR la accion de Habeas Corpus presentada por los apoderados del senor Carlos Mario Gonzalez Gomez, al Juzgado de Reparto del Circuito de Marinilla (Antioquia), a fin de que adelanten el tramite de rigor que corresponda, de conformidad con lo previsto en el articulo 30 de la constitucion Politica, la Ley 1095 de 2006 y la sentencia C-187 de 2006.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Reporting justice
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.