JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 5, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant William Castro Vargas Vs. La Industria Nacional De Gaseosas S.A.

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitudes De Adición De Sentencias Y De Reintegro De William Castro Vargas. Notoficación De Los Fallos Por Conducta Concluyente. Probado El Hecho De Que El Actor, Al Momento Del Despido, Tuvo Conocimiento De La Acción, Se Concluyó Que Tuvo La Posibilidad De Solicitar La Nulidad Del Fallo. Por Tanto, Se Decidió Denegar Tal Petición. Denegada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Denegación de adición de la sentencia T-845 de 2008
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de adición de la sentencia T-845 de 2008 presentada por William Castro Vargas. Así mismo, DENEGAR las solicitudes de "dejar sin efectos" la terminación de su contrato laboral y de ordenar el pago de salarios y prestaciones que se hayan dejado de pagar.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR al peticionario que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.