JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Yolanda Rodríguez Tole Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitudes De Aclaración Y Adición De La Sentencia Su-484 De 2008. Se Determinó La Claridad De Ciertas Formulaciones Cuestionadas Y El Incumplimiento De Los Requisitos Contemplados Para Efectos De La Adición De La Sentencia, Dispuestos En El Artículo 311 Del Código De Procedimiento Civil. Denegada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Requisitos
  • Procedencia excepcional de oficio o a solicitud de parte
  • Procedencia excepcional está condicionada a que exista una razón objetiva de duda que impida el entendimiento de la providencia
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. DENEGAR las anteriores solicitudes de aclaracion y adicion de la sentencia SU-484 dictada por la Sala Plena el 15 de Mayo de 2008, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion que dirija comunicacion, informando lo resuelto en el presente auto, a los senores (as):
  3. Yolanda Rodriguez Tole, Luz Stella Maldonado Vanegas, Alcaldia Mayor de Bogota D.C., Ministerio de Hacienda y Credito Publico y a la Gerente Liquidadora de la Fundacion San Juan de Dios.
  4. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.