JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Manuel María Márquez Angulo Vs. Cámara De Comercio De Barranquilla

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Adición Del Auto A. 194/08 Presentada Por Manuel María Márquez Angulo En Su Calidad De Ciudadano Y Como Vocero De La Veeduría Visión Compartida Ciudad Futura. Se Declaró La Improcedencia De La Solicitud Respectiva.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Denegación por improcedente de la solicitud de adición al auto A. 194 de 2008
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. Primero. DENEGAR por improcedente la solicitud de adición al auto A-194 proferido por la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional el día 30 de julio de 2008, presentada por Manuel María Márquez Angulo en su condición de ciudadano y como vocero de la Veeduría Ciudadana Visión Compartida Ciudad Futuro.
  3. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.