JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Juan Pablo Barrios Romero

✓
Topic · hard data
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra La Ley 1152 De 2007 “por La Cual Se Dicta El Estatuto De Desarrollo Rural, Se Reforma El Instituto Colombiano De Desarrollo Rural –Incoder Y Se Dictan Otras Disposiciones”. Se Resolvió Aceptar El Impedimento Señalado Por El Procurador General De La Nación Para Emitir Concepto Dentro Del Presente Asunto.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ACEPTAR el impedimento senalado por el Procurador General de la Nacion para emitir concepto dentro del presente asunto, expediente D-7395.
  2. Segundo. De conformidad con lo dispuesto en el Decreto Ley 262 del 2000 y en armonia con el Decreto 2067 de 1991, ORDENAR a la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional que, una vez se levante la suspension de terminos en el proceso de la referencia con ocasion del impedimento propuesto, corra traslado por el termino que falte al Viceprocurador General dc la Nacion, para que rinda el concepto de que tratan los articulos 242-2 y 278-5 de la Constitucion Politica.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.