A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Juan David Neira Pachon
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- No corrección ante inadmisión
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por cuanto el escrito de corrección no subsanó los defectos advertidos en la providencia de inadmisión.
Por considerar que la demanda formulada carece de aptitud sustantiva, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto del veinte (20) de junio de dos mil diecisiete (2017), mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda formulada por el ciudadano JUAN DAVID NEIRA PACHÓN, contra el artículo 1º de la Ley 141 de 1961 y el Decreto Ley 2663 de 1950, radicado con el consecutivo D-12151.
- SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.