JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 20, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Ingrid Paola Rojas Rodriguez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia C-555/13.

La peticionaria alegó una presunta violación del debido proceso.

En su opinión, la decisión adoptada repercute en la ejecución de contratos de operadores de telecomunicaciones que resultan afectados y ninguno de estos fue escuchado.

Luego de revisar el expediente la Sala Plena de la Corporación no encontró actuación o intervención alguna adelantada por la peticionaria, por lo cual consideró innecesario desatar de fondo lo propuesto y decidir RECHAZAR la nulidad invocada, por falta de legitimación.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por falta de legitimacion la solicitud de nulidad formulada por la ciudadana Ingrid Paola Rojas Rodriguez, contra la sentencia de constitucionalidad C-555 de 2013, acorde con las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Comunicar por la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, lo resuelto en el presente auto a la ciudadana Ingrid Paola Rojas Rodriguez.
  3. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.