JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Never Jiménez Jiménez Vs. Procuraduría General De La Nación –Regional Córdoba

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De Montería Y El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Córdoba –Sala De Jurisdicción Disciplinaria. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia A La Última A Fin De Que Decida La Acción De Que Se Trata.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra La Procuraduria General
  • Competencia Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REMÍTASE el expediente contentivo de la acción de tutela propuesta por Never Jiménez Jiménez contra la Procuraduría General de la Nación - Regional Córdoba, al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Córdoba -Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria-, para que le dé trámite y decida en forma inmediata.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría General COMUNÍQUESE al Juzgado
  3. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Montería la decisión adoptada en esta providencia, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aquí resuelto por la Corte Constitucional, en relación con el conflicto de competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.