JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 5, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Peña Peña Fabio·Respondent Fundacion San Juan De Dios

✓
Topic · hard data
Se Abstiene De Aldelantar La Revision Constitucional Del Expediente T-1406489 Toda Vez Que No Contiene Decision Judicial Alguna Para Revisar Y Se Ordena A La Secretaria General Proceder A Anular El Numero De Radicacion T-1406489 Por No Corresponder A Un Proceso De Tutela
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Salas De Revision De La Corte Constitucional
  • Unicamente ejerce control sobre los fallos definitivos por ende la revisión no se extiende a los actos procesales diferentes a las sentencias
Acción De Tutela
  • Función de la Corte Constitucional de revisar las decisiones judiciales proferidas por jueces constitucionales
Corte Constitucional
  • Abstención para efectuar revisión pues no corresponde a un proceso de tutela sino al trámite de incidente de desacato
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. ABSTENERSE de adelantar la revisión constitucional del expediente T-1.406.489, toda vez que no contiene decisión judicial alguna para revisar. En consecuencia, ORDENAR a la Secretaría General de esta Corporación que proceda a anular el número de radicación T-1.406.489, por no corresponder éste a un proceso de tutela.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, líbrense las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.