A- de 2020
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo
✓Claimant Jorge Luis Pabon Apicella
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Requisitos de procedencia excepcional
- Rechazar por improcedente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de adición o complementación del Auto 270/20, por medio del cual se rechazó la nulidad de la sentencia C-373/16.
Teniendo en cuenta que la Sala Plena de la Corporación no advirtió vacío alguno en la providencia controvertida, en tanto en ella se consagraron los motivos para mantener la firmeza del fallo de constitucionalidad mencionado, se RECHAZA de plano la petición formulada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR DE PLANO la solicitud presentada por el ciudadano Jorge Luis Pabon Apicella, acorde con lo expuesto en esta providencia.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.