JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 8, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Daniel Mendoza Leal

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recusación formulada en contra de la doctora Paola Andrea Meneses Mosquera.

El accionante fundamentó la recusación en el hecho de que la precitada magistrada tiene una amistad íntima con el presidente de la República y que éste, a su vez, tiene un interés personal en el asunto objeto de revisión.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZAR, por improcedente, la recusación formulada en esta oportunidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto las suscritas magistradas de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVEN
  3. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR POR IMPROCEDENTE la recusacion presentada por Daniel Mendoza Leal contra la Magistrada Paola Andrea Meneses Mosquera en el proceso de tutela T-7.927.186, que corresponde a la tutela presentada por Alvaro Uribe Velez, contra Daniel Mendoza Leal.
  4. SEGUNDO. Contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.