JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 16, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Jose Leonardo Bueno Ramirez

✓
Topic · hard data
Recusación Formulada Contra El Magistrado Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto, Debido A Que Formó Parte Los Miembros De Esta Corte Que Mediante Los Autos 155 Y 156 De 2008 Se Pronunciaron Sobre La Exequibilidad Del Acto Legislativo 02 De 2004, Que Modificó El Artículo 197 Constitucional. La Corte Encuentra Que La Recusación No Resulta Pertinente  Por Cuanto No Se Enmarca Dentro De Ninguna De Las Causales De Impedimento O Recusación Contempladas En El Decreto 2067 De 1991.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recusacion De Magistrado De La Corte Constitucional
  • Causal no contemplada en el Decreto 2067/91
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional en ejercicio de sus facultades constitucionales y legales,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Rechazar por impertinente la recusacion formulada por el ciudadano Jose Leonardo Bueno Ramirez contra el Magistrado Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto, para conocer de la constitucionalidad de la Ley 1354 de 2009, radicada bajo el numero CRF-003.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.