JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 16, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Armando Castro Mendoza Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad Del Trámite Del Referendo, Se Concluye Que La Solicitud N Prospera Porque Los Ciudadanos No Alegan Irregularidades Que Constituyan Una Clara Vulneración Del Derecho Al Debido Proceso En El Tramite De Revisión Constitucional A La Ley 1354 De 2009
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad De Proceso De Constitucionalidad
  • Carácter excepcional
  • Procedencia sobre irregularidades que impliquen violación del debido proceso
Nulidad Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Oportunidad para solicitarla
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional, en ejercicio de sus facultades constitucionales y legales,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Primero. DECLARAR improcedente la solicitud de nulidad del "tramite del referendo" presentada por los ciudadanos Armando Castro Mendoza y Ricardo Castro Mendoza.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.