JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 5, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Guillermo Torres Chinchilla Vs. Telecom En Liquidacion

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Tercero Del Circuito Judicial Administrativo De Bucaramanga Y El Juzgado Quinto Civil Municipal De Bucaramanga. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Bucaramanga
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Telecom En Liquidacion
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
Sala Plena De La Corte Constitucional
  • Conocimiento de conflictos de competencia para garantizar derechos fundamentales
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bucaramanga, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. SEGUNDO. Comuniquese al Juzgado
  3. Tercero. Civil Judicial Administrativo de Bucaramanga y Juzgado
  4. Quinto. Civil Municipal de Bucaramanga, lo aqui resuelto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.