A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
✓Claimant Abel Mateus
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma rechazo por haber operado el fenómeno de cosa juzgada constitucional con respecto a Ley Estatutaria, y el actor no desarrolló convincente y suficientemente la vulneraci
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, por la configuración de la cosa juzgada constitucional absoluta respecto de la norma acusada.
La Sala Plena, en concordancia con el Magistrado Sustanciador, consideró que sin duda operó el fenómeno de la cosa juzgada constitucional con respecto a la Ley Estatutaria 1266 de 2008 y que, además, el actor no desarrolló convincente y suficientemente la vulneración constitucional alegada.
Se CONFIRMA la providencia recurrida.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE
- CONFIRMAR el auto del 11 de julio de 2016, dictado por el Magistrado Sustanciador Alejandro Linares Cantillo, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda, identificada con el numero de radicacion D-11501.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.