A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
✓Claimant Natalia Villamil Sagre
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por improcedente
- Procedencia excepcional
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-169/16.
La Sala de Revisión concluye que la petición formulada resulta improcedente, por cuanto lejos de plantear la existencia de una frase, palabra, expresión o concepto que presente interpretaciones diversas, que generen incertidumbre o que no resulte inteligible, expone una pretensión que no fue planteada en sede de tutela.
Se RECHAZA.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-169 de 2016, presentada por la senora Natalia Villamil Sagre.
- Segundo. COMUNIQUESE la presente providencia a la peticionaria y al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Monitos, con la advertencia que contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.