JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 9, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Richard Steve Ramírez Grisales

✓Claimant Gustavo Adolfo Palacio Correa Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Incumplimiento de requisitos de especificidad y suficiencia
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recursos de súplica interpuestos en contra del auto que rechazó parcialmente dos demandas de inconstitucionalidad formuladas en contra del artículo 181 de la ley 1955 de 2019, por la cual se expide el Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2018-2022.

Tras verificar los argumentos expuestos por los recurrentes, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió CONFIRMAR en su integridad el auto cuestionado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva, el auto de 13 de agosto de 2020 dictado por el magistrado sustanciador Alberto Rojas Rios, por medio del cual rechazo parcialmente las demandas identificadas con los numeros de radicacion D-13772 y D-13779.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.