JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 7, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Consejo Comunitario De La Comunidad Negra De Zacarias Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Negar por cuanto ninguna de las expresiones contenidas en su parte resolutiva o motiva genera duda o perplejidad para su cumplimiento
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se NIEGA la solicitud de aclaración y adición de la Sentencia T-002/17, formulada por los Consejos Comunitarios de las Comunidades Negras Zacarías, Guadualito y Campo Hermoso (Río Dagua), mediante apoderado judicial.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. NEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion y adicion de la Sentencia T-002 de 2017, formulada por los Consejos Comunitarios de las Comunidades Negras de Zacarias, Guadualito y Campo Hermoso (Rio Dagua), mediante apoderado judicial, en los terminos de la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
  3. TERCERO. Por Secretaria General informese a las partes del expediente No. T- 5.635.565 lo aqui resuelto, anexandoles copia de esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.