A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
✓Claimant Hermes Cuenca Meneses
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma rechazo de demanda por cuanto fundamentos jurídicos tienen pleno arraigo constitucional, están puestos en razón y se ajustan a derecho
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, por no satisfacer los requerimientos formulados en el auto de inadmisión.
La Sala Plena CONFIRMA en su integridad la providencia recurrida, por encontrar que sus fundamentos jurídicos tienen pleno arraigo constitucional, están puestos en razón y se ajustan a derecho.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE
- CONFIRMAR el auto del 28 de junio de 2016, dictado por el Magistrado Sustanciador Alejandro Linares Cantillo, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda, identificada con el numero de radicacion D-11423.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.