JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 23, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Federacion Nacional De Departamentos

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia de aclaración o adición
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de adición de la Sentencia C-030/19.

La directora ejecutiva de la Federación Nacional de Departamentos pidió a la Corporación ampliar o diferir nuevamente los efectos del fallo de la referencia hasta la cuarta legislatura (julio 2021-junio 2022), a fin de que el Congreso, dentro de la libertad de configuración legislativa, expida la norma que determine o fije los criterios concretos y específicos para determinar la base gravable de la sobretasa a la gasolina y del ACPM.

La Sala Plena constató que la pretensión formulada fue presentada de manera extemporánea y por ello decidió RECHAZARLA

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por extemporánea la solicitud de adición de la Sentencia C-030 de 2019, presentada la directora ejecutiva de Federación Nacional de Departamentos -FDN.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR la presente providencia a la peticionaria, con la advertencia que contra esta decisión no procede ningún recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.