JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 28, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Inteconexion Electrica S.A. E.S.P.

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia SU.168/17, presentada por la representante legal judicial de la empresa Interconexión Eléctrica S.A.

E.S.P.

La memorialista pidió a la Corporación hacer referencia a los intereses de mora de las cotizaciones al Sistema de Seguridad en Salud por el retroactivo ordenado en el fallo de la referencia: Por interpretar la Sala Plena que el reproche de la entidad es más una solicitud de adición de la providencia, que de aclaración de la misma, decide DENEGARLA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. NEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia SU-168 de 2017, presentada por la abogada Lia Cecilia Cardona Galvis, representante legal judicial de Interconexion Electrica S.A. E.S.P., el 6 de junio de 2017.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.