JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 19, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Parmenia Caicedo Y Otras Vs. Alcaldía Municipal De Santiago De Cali Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Cuarto Penal Del Circuito De Santiago De Cali Y La Sala Penal Del Tribunal Superior De Distrito Judicial De Santiago De Cali. Se Decidió Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Primer Juzgado A Fin De Que Resuelva De La Acción De Que Se Trata
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Competencia Juzgado Penal del Circuito Especializado
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REMITIR, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. Penal del Circuito de Cali, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, resuelva la accion de tutela de Parmenia Caicedo, Yenci Fori, Virgelino Carabali, Lunio Aya Munoz, Marlyn Rivas, Sandra Diaz Pajoy y Buenaventura Correa contra la Alcaldia Municipal de Santiago de Cali, el DAGMA, la CVC y la EMSIRVA E.S.P.
  3. Segundo. COMUNICAR, por medio de Secretaria General, el presente auto a la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Santiago de Cali, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.