JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 6, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Eyda Luz Medina Mosquera Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se abstuvo de resolver el conflicto de competencias suscitado entre el Juzgado Primero Civil del Circuito de Cartago y el Juzgado Primero Civil del Circuito de Cali, toda vez que es la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Civil, el superior jerárquico común.

En consecuencia, se remite el expediente a la citada Corte para lo de su competencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. Primero. ABSTENERSE de resolver el conflicto de competencias suscitado entre el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Cartago y el Juzgado
  3. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Cali.
  4. Segundo. DECLARAR que la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casacion Civil, es la autoridad competente para decidir el conflicto de competencias suscitado entre el Juzgado
  5. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Cartago y el Juzgado
  6. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Cali.
  7. Tercero. REMITIR, por medio de la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, el expediente a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para lo de su competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Reporting justice
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Presidente
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 1cited by 0 →A. 321/01C-037/96 — Proyecto De Ley N°58/94 Senado Y 264/95 Camara Estatutaria De La Admon De Justicia. Exequibles E Inexequibles. · cited 1,231 timesC-037/961996
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites1
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.