A- de 2018
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
✓Claimant Alberto Rojas Rios·Respondent Consejo De Estado Seccion Quinta
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia
- Competencia de la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Manifestación de impedimento para decidir la tutela de la referencia, presentada por los Conjueces Catalina Botero Marino y Juan Ramón Martínez Vargas.
La Sala concluye que la elección de conjueces no hace parte del ejercicio de una función nominadora y que éstos no son servidores ni funcionarios públicos, no son remunerados, ni obtienen un beneficio personal como si lo hace un servidor judicial.
Precisa, que por lo anterior no les son aplicables los impedimentos establecidos en el artículo 126 de la Constitución.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. NEGAR con base en las razones expresadas en esta providencia, los impedimentos manifestados por los Conjueces Catalina Botero Marino y Juan Ramón Martínez Vargas para decidir la tutela del expediente T-5.027.021.
- Notifíquese,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.