JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 18, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Actualización según sentencia T-760/08
Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y A La Vida
  • Solicitud información a Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social sobre actualización del POS según sentencia T-760/08
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se solicita al señor Ministro de Salud y Protección Social absolver los interrogantes formulados en el presente proveído y relacionados con la actualización del POS, antes del 28 de febrero de 2014 y en los estrictos términos establecidos.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Ordenar al senor Ministro de Salud y Proteccion Social que absuelva los interrogantes formulados en la consideracion num. 4 de esta providencia, antes del 28 de febrero de 2014, en los estrictos terminos establecidos en este auto.
  2. Segundo. A traves de la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, expidase la comunicacion correspondiente y remitase copia de este proveido.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.