JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 19, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Marybel Segura Ramírez Vs. El Presidente De La República Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre La Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Del Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cundinamarca, El Juzgado 33 Civil Del Circuito De Bogotá Y La Sala Civil Del Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Bogotá. Se Resolvió Ordenar A La Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Del Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cundinamarca Asumir El Conocimiento De La Acción De La Referencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Tutela
  • No corresponde determinar a priori contra quienes debe dirigirse la acción
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridad Del Orden Nacional
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Acción De Tutela
  • Competencia Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ORDENAR a la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca, que de forma inmediata, asuma el conocimiento de la solicitud de proteccion constitucional de la referencia conforme a las previsiones del articulo 86 de la Constitucion Politica y del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, comuniquese a los despachos judiciales en colision, la decision adoptada en esta providencia para los fines alli indicados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.