JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 30, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant José Angel Silva Casallas

✓
Topic · hard data
Incidente De Desacato De La Sentencia T 440a De 2009. La Sala Recuerda Que Es El Juzgado De Primera Instancia El Competente Para Velar Por El Cumplimiento De Los Fallos De  Tutela. No Asumir.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Abstenerse de tramitar solicitud de apertura de incidente de desacato
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. NO. ASUMIR la petición de iniciar incidente de desacato, presentada por el señor José Ángel Silva Casallas.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR al Juzgado
  3. Cuarto. Promiscuo Municipal de Bogotá la solicitud de abrir el incidente de desacato frente a la sentencia T -440A de 2009, para que determine lo que estime pertinente.
  4. Tercero. INFORMAR al solicitante esta decisión, por intermedio de la Secretaría General de esta corporación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.