JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 18, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Corpoguajira·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia por presentación dentro del término de ejecutoria
  • Procedencia respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
Aclaracion Fallo De Revision De Tutela
  • Reiteración de la improcedencia
Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional del artículo 309 del Código de Procedimiento Civil
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Aclaración de sentencia.

La Jefe de la Oficina Jurídica de Corpoguajira solicitó a la Corte aclarar la sentencia T-204/11y para justificar la petición se limitó a realizar tres preguntas concretas sobre la providencia.

La Sala de Revisión decide NO ACCEDER a la solicitud de aclaración presentada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NO ACCEDER a la solicitud de aclaracion de la sentencia T-204 proferida por la Sala Sexta de Revision en marzo 24 de 2011.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR a la solicitante que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.