JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 22, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Juan Ricardo Mejia Otero·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-201/10.

El peticionario fundamentó su solicitud en el sentido de indicar que se violó el debido proceso en la decisión adoptada, por cuanto se ignoró la existencia de un documento radicado por él, en el cual se aportó información crucial y decisiva de los argumentos elevados por la Sala de Revisión.

La solicitud de nulidad no cumplió con la carga argumentativa exigida para que exista la modificación de un fallo, ya que no se señaló la afectación ostensible, probada y significativa de la omisión alegada.

Se DENIEGA la solicitud.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la nulidad de la sentencia T-201 de 2010 proferida por la Sala Octava de Revision.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.