JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 1, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Oscar Fernando Vanegas Avila

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Codigo Penal
  • Recurso de súplica
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Frente Al Codigo Penal
  • Rechazar recurso de súplica por extemporáneo
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica formulado contra el auto proferido por la Magistrada Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez para rechazar la demanda de la referencia, luego de considerar que en la formulación del cargo persistía el incumplimiento de las condiciones argumentativas reclamadas en el auto de inadmisión.

Se rechaza por extemporáneo el recurso de súplica interpuesto.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR POR EXTEMPORÁNEO el recurso de súplica presentado por el ciudadano Oscar Fernando Vanegas Ávila contra el auto del 2 de septiembre de 2014, proferido por la magistrada Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez, que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. A través de la Secretaría General de la Corte, comuníquese el contenido de esta decisión al recurrente, indicándole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
  3. TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decisión, archívese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.