JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 12, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Olga Hernández Granados Vs. Nueva Eps

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Tercero Penal Municipal Con Funciones De Garantías Y El Juzgado Segundo Administrativo, Ambos De Bucaramanga. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente Contentivo De La Acción De Tutela De La Referencia Al Juzgado Tercero Penal Municipal Con Funciones De Garantías Para Que Asuma El Conocimiento Del Proceso En Cuestión
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Competencia Juez Penal Municipal
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia de Juez Municipal cuando la tutela se interpone contra particulares
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Por la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, REMITASE el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por la ciudadana Olga Hernandez Granados contra la Nueva EPS al Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Penal Municipal con Funcion de Control de Garantias de Bucaramanga para que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la accion de tutela de la referencia.
  3. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado
  4. Segundo. Administrativo de Bucaramanga, lo resuelto en esta providencia con el fin de ponerle en conocimiento los fundamentos constitucionales y legales en virtud de los cuales se adopta la presente decision.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.