JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 4, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Gladys Chinoite Paipa Vs. Ministerio De Hacienda Y Credito Publico Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cundinamarca Y El Juzgado Noveno Civil Del Circuito De Bogota. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Contentivo De La Accion De Tutela Al Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cundinamarca.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Principios básicos para la protección de derechos fundamentales
  • Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura y Tribunal Administrativo
  • Autoridad pública del orden nacional
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. Por Secretaria General REMITASE el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por la senora Gladys Chinote Paipa contra los Ministerios de Hacienda y Credito Publico y de la Proteccion Social, la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud, la Universidad Nacional, la Beneficencia de Cundinamarca, Fiduciaria la Previsora S.A. y el Departamento de Cundinamarca, al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca, para que este asuma en forma inmediata el conocimiento del referido amparo constitucional y, en consecuencia, adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE la decision adoptada en esta providencia al Juzgado
  3. Noveno. Civil del Circuito de Bogota, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.