JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 15, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Jhon Fredy Torres Gil Y Otros Vs Corporacion Universitaria Lasallista·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Jurisprudencia En Vigor
  • Precedente obligatorio para las salas de revisión
Accion De Tutela Contra Corporacion Universitaria
  • Denegar solicitud de nulidad de sentencia T-020/10 por no constituirse precedente vinculante
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-020/10, los accionantes alegan que para resolver su caso esta corporación hizo un cambio de jurisprudencia.

La Corte encuentra que no existen presupuestos fácticos, ni jurídicos, iguales o al menos similares que constituyan un precedente vinculante para la revisión de la sentencia de tutela efectuada por la decisión T-020/10, por lo que se decide denegar la nulidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la nulidad de la sentencia T- 020 de 2010 proferida por la Sala Octava de Revision.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.