JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 15, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Maria Victoria Puyana De Williamson Vs Juzgado Once Civil Del Circuito De Bogota Y Otro·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
Accion De Tutela Contra Juzgado Civil Del Circuito Y Tribunal Superior
  • Denegar solicitud de nulidad de sentencia T-033/10
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad, la peticionaria considera que en la sentencia de la referencia se le vulneró el derecho al debido proceso, ya que hubo una falta absoluta de apreciación de las pruebas y se desconoció el precedente vertical de la Sala de Casación Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia.

La Corte concluye que en la sentencia no hubo desconocimiento del debido proceso, toda vez que se estudiaron todas las pruebas y todos los argumentos esgrimidos por la peticionaria, por lo que se decide denegar la solicitud de nulidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-033 de 2010 proferida por la Sala Quinta de Revision de la Corte Constitucional, presentada por la senora Maria Victoria Puyana de Williamson.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.