JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 24, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Hugo Alberto Coronel Gonzalez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica
  • Procedencia contra auto que rechaza demanda
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Cumplimiento de requisitos formales
  • Razones claras, ciertas, específicas, pertinentes y suficientes
5 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por no satisfacer los requerimientos hechos en el auto de inadmisión, relacionados con la inobservancia de los presupuestos de especificidad, pertinencia y suficiencia en la formulación de los cargos.

La Sala Plena coincide con el magistrado sustanciador, en cuanto a concluir que el demandante no corrigió el líbelo en los términos indicados.

Se confirma el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. CONFIRMAR el auto del 29 de julio de 2013 dictado por el Magistrado Sustanciador Luis Guillermo Guerrero Perez, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad, identificada con el numero de radicacion D-9684, por las consideraciones expuestas en la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.