JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 1, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Ramirez Rodriguez Carmen Rosa·Respondent Colegio Niño Jesus

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad Por Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la tutela interpuesta por la ciudadana de la referencia contra el Colegio Niño Jesús, a partir del auto proferido por el Juzgado Quinto Laboral del Circuito de Bogotá, toda vez que se le dio aplicación al Decreto 1382 de 2000 que resultó contrario a la Constitución.

En consecuencia, se ordenó remitir el expediente al mencionado Juzgado para que realice el trámite que corresponda conforme a la Ley.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. DECLARAR la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la accion de tutela interpuesta por Carmen Rosa Ramirez Rodriguez contra el Colegio Nino Jesus, a partir del auto de 26 de febrero de 2001, proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Laboral del Circuito de Bogota.
  3. Segundo. REMITASE el expediente al Juzgado
  4. Quinto. Laboral del Circuito de Bogota para que de manera inmediata se le imprima a esta accion de tutela el tramite que corresponda conforme a la Ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.