JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 23, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

✓Claimant Ángela María Tobón Meneses·Respondent Secretaría De Movilidad De Medellín

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Doce Penal Municipal Con Función De Control De Garantías De Medellín Y El Juzgado Segundo Civil Municipal De Oralidad De Bello
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Aplicación del principio de la perpetuatio jurisdictionis
Factor Territorial
  • Competencia a prevención del lugar donde ocurrió la violación o donde tiene efectos
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir al Juzgado 12 Penal Municipal con Función de Control de Garantías de Medellín, el expediente de la referencia para que, de manera inmediata, tramite y adopte la decisión de fondo en la acción de tutela presentada por la accionante contra la Secretaría de Movilidad de Medellín, toda vez que avocó el conocimiento del recurso de amparo, en atención al principio de la perpetuatio jurisdictionis, no podía suspender el examen y debe continuar su estudio.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR al Juzgado Doce Penal Municipal con Funcion de Control de Garantias de Medellin, el expediente ICC-3307 para que, de manera inmediata, tramite y adopte la decision de fondo en la accion de tutela presentada por Angela Maria Tobon Meneses contra la Secretaria de Movilidad de Medellin .
  2. SEGUNDO. Por la Secretaria General de la Corporacion, COMUNICAR a la accionante y al Juzgado
  3. Segundo. Civil Municipal de Oralidad de Bello, la decision adoptada en esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.