A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa
✓Claimant Jorge Arango Mejia
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se rechaza por cuanto auto no tiene conceptos o frases que ofrezcan verdadero motivo de duda
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración del Auto 277/16, por medio del cual se resolvió una recusación formulada contra el Magistrado Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva.
Por considerar que la precitada providencia no tiene conceptos o frases que ofrezcan motivo de duda, la Sala Plena decide RECHAZAR la petición presentada por el ciudadano Jorge Arango Mejía.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud de aclaracion del auto 277 de 2016 emanado de la Sala Plena, presentada por el ciudadano Jorge Arango Mejia.
- Segundo. Contra el presente auto no procede ningun recurso.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.