JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 31, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Polidoro Miranda Miranda

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se abstuvo de resolver el conflicto negativo de competencia suscitado entre dos Tribunales Superiores del Distrito Judicial, toda vez que es la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia el superior jerárquico común.

En consecuencia, se remitió el expediente a la citada Sala para que dirime el conflicto planteado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Abstenerse de resolver el conflicto negativo de competencia, suscitado entre las autoridades judiciales involucradas.
  2. Segundo. Remitir el expediente a la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para que ella defina cual de los dos Tribunales Superiores del Distrito Judicial, es competente para conocer en segunda instancia de la accion de tutela incoada por el senor POLIDORO MIRANDA MIRANDA, contra el Instituto Nacional Penitenciario y Carcelario "INPEC".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.