A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Cesar Sanchez Aragon
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por falta de certeza en cargo de inconstitucionalidad
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, en tanto el escrito de corrección no subsanó los defectos indicados en la providencia de inadmisión.
Tras advertir que la demanda no cumple con los requisitos de suficiencia y certeza, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (4 points)
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto del veintidós (22) de junio de dos mil dieciséis (2016), mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda formulada por el ciudadano Cesar Sánchez Aragón, contra los artículos 3º numerales 3.1., inciso
- segundo. y 3.9 inciso
- segundo. de la Ley 923 de 2004.
- SEGUNDO. COMUNÍQUESE la presente providencia a las peticionarias, informándole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.