JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 1, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Anita Rueda De Rojas·Respondent Ministerio De Defensa Nacional Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Adicion De Sentencia T-856/14.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Temas a tratar: Procedencia excepcional para adicionar sentencias de la Corte Constitucional según artículo 311 del Código de Procedimiento Civil, Requisitos.

Se adiciona numeral de parte resolutiva en el sentido de que sustitución pensional reconocida debe hacerse efectiva a partir de fecha de fallecimiento del causante y debe incluir retroactivo pensional y mesadas adicionales no prescritas

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONCEDER la solicitud de adicion de la Sentencia T-856 de 2014, formulada por la senora Anita Rueda de Rojas.
  2. SEGUNDO. ADICIONAR el numeral
  3. segundo. de la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia T-856 de 2014, en el sentido de que la sustitucion pensional reconocida a la senora Anita Rueda de Rojas debe hacerse efectiva a partir de la fecha de fallecimiento del causante y debe incluir el retroactivo pensional y las mesadas adicionales que no hayan sido objeto de prescripcion.
  4. TERCERO. Contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
  5. Notifiquese, comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Reporting justice
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Concurring opinion
Read concurrence
✓
Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceGloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.