JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 14, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant José Leonardo Bueno Ramírez

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Suspensión De La Revisión De Constitucionalidad De La Ley 1354 De 2009, Mientras La Sala Plena De Lo Contencioso Administrativo Del Consejo De Estado Decide Sobre La Constitucionalidad Del Decreto 4742 De 2008, De Diciembre Dieciséis (16) De 2008, “por El Cual Se Convoca Al Congreso De La República A Sesiones Extraordinarias”, Decreto Que Fue Expedido Dentro Del Trámite Legislativo De La Ley 1354 De 2009 “por Medio De La Cual Se Convoca Un Referendo Y Se Somete A Consideración Del Pueblo Un Proyecto De Reforma Constitucional”.  La Corte Descarta La Procedencia De La Prejuidicalidad Alegada Por El Actor.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Primero. DECLARAR improcedente la solicitud de suspension de la revision de constitucional de la Ley 1354 de 2009 formulada por el ciudadano Jose Leonardo Bueno Ramirez.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.