JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 5, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Empresa Cooperativa De Servicios De Salud – Emcosalud- Vs. Hospital Departamental San Antonio De Pitalito

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Primero Penal Del Circuito Especializado De Neiva Y El Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo Del Huila. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Juzgado Primero Penal Del Circuito Especializado De Neiva Para Que Lleve A Cabo La Correspondiente Actuación Judicial.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando autoridades judiciales son de diferente jurisdicción y carecen de superior jerárquico común
  • Organismo o entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional o autoridad pública del orden departamental
Acción De Tutela
  • Competencia Juzgado Penal del Circuito Especializado
Principio Perpetuatio Jurisdictionis
  • No se puede trasladar conocimiento de tutela en razón del cambio de naturaleza de entidades demandadas por afectar derechos fundamentales
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente al Juzgado
  2. Primero. Penal del Circuito Especializado de Neiva, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  3. SEGUNDO. Comuniquese a la Sala Tercera de Decision del Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Huila, lo aqui resuelto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.