JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 16, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Luis Ignacio Pulido Salguero Y Otro·Respondent Exxonmobil De Colombia S.A.

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Desacumulación de expedientes
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se decreta la desacumulación procesal de los expedientes T-6105296 y T-6107926 cuya acumulación fue ordenada por la Sala de Selección Número Cuatro mediante providencia del 27 de abril del 2017, para que cada uno sea fallado en una sentencia independiente.

Lo anterior, en virtud de advertir elementos que singularizan la situación fáctica y jurídica de cada asunto que impiden que sean fallados en una misma sentencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (9 points)
  1. DECRETAR la desacumulación procesal de los expedientes T-6.105.296 y T-6.107.926, cuya acumulación fue ordenada por la Sala de Selección Número Cuatro de la Corte Constitucional mediante Auto del 27 de abril de 2017, para que cada uno sea fallado en una sentencia independiente.
  2. Cúmplase,
  3. GLORIA STELLA ORTIZ DELGADO
  4. Magistrada
  5. IVÁN HUMBERTO ESCRUCERÍA MAYOLO
  6. Magistrado (e.)
  7. CRISTINA PARDO SCHLESINGER
  8. Magistrado
  9. ROCÍO LOAIZA MILIÁN
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.