JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 12, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y La Vida
  • Seguimiento al cumplimiento de la orden vigésima octava de la sentencia T-760/08
Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y A La Vida
  • Requerimiento de información adicional a Superintendencia Nacional de Salud sobre cartas de derechos y deberes del afiliado y/o paciente y cartas de desempeño de las
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se solicita información adicional a la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud, sobre el contenido y entrega de las cartas de derechos, deberes y desempeño por parte de las Empresas Promotoras de Salud.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Ordenar al Superintendente Nacional de Salud que, dentro del termino maximo de cinco (5) dias, contados a partir del dia siguiente al recibo de la comunicacion de este auto, remita el reporte solicitado en las consideraciones num. 5, 6 y 7 de esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Proceda la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion a librar la comunicacion correspondiente, acompanando copia de este proveido.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.